The concern over whether or even not the particular particular Windows eight requirement regarding ‘Secure Boot’ will prevent customers through setting up additional operating systems has already already been addressed simply by Microsoft‘s Steven Sinofsky in the blog post on the Microsoft Developers Network website.
Pre-built Windows eight-ten computers in which would like the actual “Windows Certified” sticker have to be able to be able to offer support regarding “Secure Boot” as well because enable this particular simply by go into default, but this kind of remains up towards the OEMs as in order to whether they offer a great ‘off’ switch to be able to allow people regarding some other operating systems – including Microsoft’utes own – the actual actual ability inside order in order to install/boot into them.
Yet what Microsoft are not doing is actually asking OEMs to be able to prevent Secure Boot being disabled simply simply by the actual user: -
“…these kinds regarding decisions are left towards the OEM. There may be good reasons why certain enterprises may not would like PCs inside which can easily be configured in this kind from the way, as well as there may be good reasons why any great OEM or perhaps white box retailer may choose in order to be able to be able to allow within that flexiblity (sic) regarding their particular customers. It’s all about choice and also also flexibility.”
The relevant part associated along with Microsoft’utes article, at least inside the point-associated with-view of the ‘concerned Linux user’, will be discovered towards the particular end using the post, although they explicitly avoid referring in order to Linux: -
“At the particular actual end in the day, the actual customer is actually actually inside power over their PC. Microsoft’utes philosophy is inside order in order to offer customers with all the finest experience initial, because well as allow them within order to make decisions themselves. We work along together with our OEM ecosystem to be able to supply customers together with this kind of flexibility. The security that UEFI provides in order to be able to be able to offer together together with secure boot means which the actual majority associated with customers will have their own particular systems protected against boot loader attacks.
For the particular actual enthusiast which wants to be able to run older operating systems, the option will be there to be able to allow you in order to make within which decision.
The demonstration associated together with this kind of particular manage will be identified inside the actual particular Samsung tablet with Windows 8 Developer Preview which usually provides already been offered to //BUILD/ participants. Inside the particular screenshot beneath you will notice that we designed the actual firmware within order to be able to allow the particular customer to be able to be able to disable secure boot.
However, doing so arrives at your own risk. OEMs are free of charge in order to be able to choose how in order to enable this particular particular support as well since may further customize the actual parameters since described above within any good effort to be able to be able in order to deliver unique value propositions for their own customers.
Windows merely did work within order to be able to supply great OS support to get any scenario we believe many will find valuable across consumers because well as enterprise customers.”
Image of a console along with options together with regard in order to TPM Configuration: Enable virtualization [enabled], CSM Support [Disabled], Attempt Secure Boot [Enabled], Display Rev. Info - Intel UEFI...
The probability will be in which the actual majority regarding OEMs – at least those having any vested interest inside making money - will supply a good option to be able to be able to be able to disable Secure Boot, thus allowing you within order to boot into Ie8, Fedora, Android, Windows 98, etc.
However will this added layer, of what we Brits call ‘faff‘, put potential brand fresh customers off?
You need me inside order in order to disable a _security feature_ therefore We can easily easily boot into this particular Linux thing?
Image credit: Steven Sinofsky
Pre-built Windows eight-ten computers in which would like the actual “Windows Certified” sticker have to be able to be able to offer support regarding “Secure Boot” as well because enable this particular simply by go into default, but this kind of remains up towards the OEMs as in order to whether they offer a great ‘off’ switch to be able to allow people regarding some other operating systems – including Microsoft’utes own – the actual actual ability inside order in order to install/boot into them.
Yet what Microsoft are not doing is actually asking OEMs to be able to prevent Secure Boot being disabled simply simply by the actual user: -
“…these kinds regarding decisions are left towards the OEM. There may be good reasons why certain enterprises may not would like PCs inside which can easily be configured in this kind from the way, as well as there may be good reasons why any great OEM or perhaps white box retailer may choose in order to be able to be able to allow within that flexiblity (sic) regarding their particular customers. It’s all about choice and also also flexibility.”
The relevant part associated along with Microsoft’utes article, at least inside the point-associated with-view of the ‘concerned Linux user’, will be discovered towards the particular end using the post, although they explicitly avoid referring in order to Linux: -
“At the particular actual end in the day, the actual customer is actually actually inside power over their PC. Microsoft’utes philosophy is inside order in order to offer customers with all the finest experience initial, because well as allow them within order to make decisions themselves. We work along together with our OEM ecosystem to be able to supply customers together with this kind of flexibility. The security that UEFI provides in order to be able to be able to offer together together with secure boot means which the actual majority associated with customers will have their own particular systems protected against boot loader attacks.
For the particular actual enthusiast which wants to be able to run older operating systems, the option will be there to be able to allow you in order to make within which decision.
The demonstration associated together with this kind of particular manage will be identified inside the actual particular Samsung tablet with Windows 8 Developer Preview which usually provides already been offered to //BUILD/ participants. Inside the particular screenshot beneath you will notice that we designed the actual firmware within order to be able to allow the particular customer to be able to be able to disable secure boot.
However, doing so arrives at your own risk. OEMs are free of charge in order to be able to choose how in order to enable this particular particular support as well since may further customize the actual parameters since described above within any good effort to be able to be able in order to deliver unique value propositions for their own customers.
Windows merely did work within order to be able to supply great OS support to get any scenario we believe many will find valuable across consumers because well as enterprise customers.”
Image of a console along with options together with regard in order to TPM Configuration: Enable virtualization [enabled], CSM Support [Disabled], Attempt Secure Boot [Enabled], Display Rev. Info - Intel UEFI...
The probability will be in which the actual majority regarding OEMs – at least those having any vested interest inside making money - will supply a good option to be able to be able to be able to disable Secure Boot, thus allowing you within order to boot into Ie8, Fedora, Android, Windows 98, etc.
However will this added layer, of what we Brits call ‘faff‘, put potential brand fresh customers off?
You need me inside order in order to disable a _security feature_ therefore We can easily easily boot into this particular Linux thing?
Image credit: Steven Sinofsky
Labels: Address, Attempt, Linux, Microsoft, Windows, Worries
